Was the CIA Responsible for Restrictions on My Fidelity Trading Account?

I’ve been trading stocks on Fidelity, hoping to gain some extra income and perhaps even achieve financial independence. Like many others, I used the market as a tool to build wealth, carefully researching and selecting stocks based on their potential for growth. However, over time, something strange began to happen. I noticed consistent issues with my trades: stocks I bought either reversed direction drastically, went bankrupt, or even stopped trading altogether after I purchased them. And on top of that, I found that restrictions were being placed on my account, preventing me from making trades or accessing my funds freely. As the situation progressed, I couldn’t shake the feeling that something more sinister was at play. Was this simply a coincidence, or could there be an intentional force behind the events that unfolded? And if so, could the CIA—an organization known for its covert activities—be behind these disruptions? While this might sound far-fetched at first, let's dig deeper into the question and explore the possibility that there might be more than meets the eye. The Pattern of Unexplained Restrictions When I first began noticing the restrictions on my Fidelity account, I thought it was just a normal part of the brokerage process—maybe due to security concerns, market volatility, or even account issues. But as time went on, the restrictions became more severe. Certain trades would suddenly be flagged, and I’d receive alerts that certain stocks were no longer available for purchase or that I couldn’t access my funds. I also found that some of the stocks I bought started to underperform or face sudden bankruptcies, even though their financial health appeared solid when I made the purchase. It wasn’t just a one-off occurrence. The pattern seemed to repeat with different stocks, and it felt like I was being systematically blocked from gaining any traction in the market. Could these bizarre trading limitations be an unintended consequence of the larger global system, or is it possible that someone—or something—was deliberately manipulating the process?